Julien Luke pictured above
Dear Mr. Luke,
As you’ll see from this case summary:
👉 https://propertycorruption.com/editors-story-june-19-2025/
TLT is currently listed as representing NatWest in a potential repossession matter that has now stalled — likely due to the implications of court disclosure and evidentiary exposure.
We note your leadership in In The Style (High Court, February 2023), where you and TLT rightly advocated for the importance of extended disclosure under CPR. That precedent stands in sharp contrast to the current stonewalling and suppression in this case, which involves far more serious matters — including attempted murder.
Given your role in shaping disclosure arguments, we would welcome your thoughts on how you reconcile those past principles with TLT’s current approach. Your insight could help inform and perhaps even shift the perspective of TLT leadership as they navigate the deeper implications of this case.
Reading your response to the 2023 win:
“I am delighted with the judgment and this victory for Adam. His is a real success story; having started the business of In The Style in his bedroom… I am proud to have led the TLT team in order to achieve this fantastic result for our client.”
— Julien Luke
Given your delight at the In The Style victory, we assume you are now a strong advocate for extended disclosure across the board — for either side in a dispute.
At PropertyCorruption.com, we believe in extended pre-litigation engagement, broad disclosure, and open, on-the-record discussions shared publicly. In that sense, our missions may be more aligned than they first appear — it’s all about broadening transparency, especially when the stakes are systemic.
We are publishing this letter openly, in that same spirit of transparency.
Sincerely,
PropertyCorruption.com