A defining feature of the relevant building governance breakdown is the complete absence of director accountability, both historically and at present, despite directors remaining the legally responsible body under the RTM structure.
Past Serious Allegations — Directors’ Response
For nearly two years, Oakley Property has refused to provide even the basic names of past RTM directors, repeatedly stating that this information is “public record,” while declining to disclose it directly.
During many of the relevant periods, the directors appear to have been insured under AXA Directors’ & Officers’ (D&O) cover, meaning director-level liability protection existed while serious issues were already emerging.
Despite this, the directors have consistently refused to answer emails or engage in any meaningful governance communication.
The result is a historic accountability structure that was insured, yet functionally silent.
Current Serious Allegations — Directors’ Response
The same pattern now continues under more severe conditions.
The current RTM directors — Sam Arshi, Gerry Bloom, Chris Bradley, Lucy Clow, and Andrew Pavli — still refuse to respond to any emails or communications, despite ongoing serious safety and governance concerns.
At the same time, Oakley Property has not confirmed whether director-level insurance still exists, and no current Directors’ & Officers’ cover has been disclosed.
This creates an extraordinary governance void: directors remain legally responsible, yet are non-responsive, and residents cannot verify whether any director liability framework is even in place.
Conclusion
An RTM structure cannot function where directors are silent, unaccountable, and potentially uninsured. The unresolved absence of director disclosure and insurance confirmation leaves the building operating inside an accountability vacuum with significant legal and risk implications.
Update: See update here